eeztech
AutomotiveGoal: cut operational costs and time8 months to first release

Every customer touchpoint in one view

A car brand’s national importer talked to customers through the website, 60 dealers, the call centre, test drives, service visits and email campaigns — and every channel kept its own data. Marketing could not see one customer or tell which campaign actually led to a sale.

Client
National importer of an automotive brand and its 60 dealers
Their team
CRM marketing lead (owner), dealer network manager, analytics, IT
Our team
Product manager, 5 engineers, data engineer, analyst
Timeline
8 months to the first full release · 3 years of development
7 → 1
customer data sources joined into one profile
92%
of leads reach a dealer within 15 minutes
3 weeks → next day
to see a campaign’s results
1.2 million
customer profiles

The business goal

Know each customer across all channels, send the right offer at the right moment, and see which campaigns lead to test drives and sales — not just clicks.

Agreed in the outcome brief
Criteria
Leads reaching a dealer quickly; test drives and sales linked to campaigns; time to a campaign report
Baseline
41% of leads reached a dealer within a day; campaign reports took 3 weeks
Target
90% of leads within 15 minutes; reports the next day
Pilot exit
Two regions and 12 dealers on the new lead flow for one quarter

Where it was

Leads from the website, events and the call centre lived in separate systems, dealers kept their own lists, and campaign results were put together by hand in spreadsheets three weeks later.

7 systems
web · dealers · call centre · service · email
Manual exports
spreadsheets, 3 weeks of delay
Campaigns
the same message for everyone

What we did

  1. 1Discovery · 4 weeksMapped every channel and system that touches a customer, and the questions marketing could not answer.
  2. 2Customer data hub · 4 monthsOne layer that collects touchpoints from all channels, matches them to one customer and keeps consent.
  3. 3CRM marketing & dealers · 4 monthsSegments and campaigns built on the profile; leads routed to the right dealer with follow-up tracking. Piloted in two regions first.
  4. 4Analytics & profiling · ongoingCampaign dashboards from first touch to test drive and sale; customer profiles and segments for targeting.

What did not work

Matching the same customer across dealer systems by name and phone alone produced too many false merges. We switched to a stricter rule — phone plus email or car VIN — with a review queue for doubtful matches. Profiles grew more slowly, but marketing trusts them.

Who did what

The client’s team
Owned the marketing goals, brought dealers on board, defined consent rules.
Our team
Integrations, the data hub, CRM tools, dashboards, ongoing development.
Together
A monthly review of campaign results and of data quality.

Before and after

NumberBeforeAfter
Customer data sources7 separate systems1 profile
Leads reaching a dealer quickly41% within a day92% within 15 min
Time to a campaign report3 weeksnext day
Test drives linked to a campaignunknown78%
Email campaign → test drive0.4%1.1%

Under the hood

Integrations with the website, dealer management systems, call centre and email platform; customer identity matching (phone + email or VIN) with a review queue; consent management; event store; segmentation and campaign tools; BI dashboards for campaign analytics.
For the first time we can see which campaign sold the car — not just which one got the clicks.
CRM Marketing Lead, automotive importer · name withheld at the client’s request
Similar cases
Wholesale11 → 2 minSupplier invoices and customer orders entered into the ERP without retypingHR software41%AI hiring assistant inside the product — and a new paid tier around itRetail−31%Store replenishment suggestions instead of spreadsheets and gut feeling
A similar situation?
Get a starting plan for your situation in three questions — or talk it through with us.