eeztech
ManufacturingGoal: find where AI pays off3-week map + 12 weeks

From “we need AI” to same-day quotes

A manufacturer of laser-cut, bent and welded metal parts knew AI mattered but had no idea where it would pay off first. We started with a three-week opportunity map — and quoting came out on top.

Client
Metal parts manufacturer, Germany & Poland
Their team
CEO and sales director (owners), 6 sales engineers, ERP admin
Our team
Engagement lead, 2 engineers, data scientist
Timeline
3-week map · 9-week pilot · production in 2 months
3 days → 4 h
to prepare a quote for a standard part
2.1×
more quotes per sales engineer
+9 points
win rate
9
AI opportunities mapped and ranked by payback

The business goal

Answer more requests for quotation, faster — customers often order from whoever replies first — without hiring more sales engineers, who are very hard to find.

Agreed in the outcome brief
Criteria
Hours from request for quotation (RFQ) to quote sent
Baseline
3 working days median; 38% of RFQs never answered
Target
Same-day quotes for standard parts
Pilot exit
Estimates within ±10% of the engineer’s price on 80% of test RFQs

Where it was

RFQs arrived by email with PDF and CAD drawings. A sales engineer read each drawing, searched the ERP for similar past jobs and calculated material, machine time and margin by hand. Busy weeks meant many RFQs simply went unanswered.

RFQs
email · PDF · CAD drawings
Sales engineer
reads, searches old jobs, calculates
Quote
3 days later — or never

What we did

  1. 1Opportunity map · 3 weeksInterviews with 14 people, a look at the data, nine ideas ranked by payback and effort — quoting, production planning, supplier invoices and more.
  2. 2Outcome brief · 1 weekQuoting chosen. Baseline measured, target and exit rule agreed with the sales director.
  3. 3Pilot · 9 weeksDrawing and RFQ parsing, search over 18,000 past jobs, a suggested price from ERP history; the engineer adjusts and approves. 83% within ±10% — continue.
  4. 4Production & runERP integration, quote PDF generation, a monthly review of accuracy and win rate.

What did not work

Complex welded assemblies: estimates were off by up to 40%. They stay fully manual — but the tool still finds similar past jobs, which saves an engineer about an hour each.

Who did what

The client’s team
The sales director owned the target, engineers labelled 600 past quotes, the ERP admin cleaned up cost data.
Our team
Ran the opportunity map, built the models and the tool, measured accuracy weekly.
Together
Every week: the tool’s price next to the engineer’s price, and why they differ.

Before and after

NumberBeforeAfter
Time to quote (standard parts)3 days4 h
RFQs left unanswered38%9%
Quotes per engineer per week1429
Win rate21%30%
Estimates within ±10%—85%

Under the hood

Parsing of DXF/STEP and PDF drawings for geometry, material and thickness; LLM extraction of quantities and requirements from RFQ emails; vector search over 18,000 past jobs; pricing model trained on ERP actuals; quote PDF generation and ERP write-back.
The map changed the conversation. Instead of “we need AI”, we argued about which of nine numbers to move first.
Sales Director, metal parts manufacturer · name withheld at the client’s request
Similar cases
Wholesale11 → 2 minSupplier invoices and customer orders entered into the ERP without retypingInsurance2.5 h → 35 minA stalled chatbot pilot turned into an offer-preparation assistant for brokersRetail−31%Store replenishment suggestions instead of spreadsheets and gut feeling
A similar situation?
Get a starting plan for your situation in three questions — or talk it through with us.